|
Conservatively Speaking
State Senator Mary Lazich (R-New Berlin), whose district includes New Berlin, Franklin, Greendale, Hales Corners, and parts of Greenfield, has been in the Legislature for more than a decade.
She considers herself a tireless crusader for lower taxes, reduced spending and smaller government.
May 2008 - Posts
By Mary Lazich
Saturday, May 31 2008, 06:36 AM
I have completed a series of town hall meetings in state Senate District 28 in the communities that I represent: New Berlin, Franklin, Greendale, Greenfield, Hales Corners, Big Bend, Muskego, Mukwonago, Waterford, East Troy, and Waukesha.
Constituents attending came armed with a variety of questions and topics they wanted to discuss. There were, however, specific issues residents of Senate District 28 consistently raised at virtually every town hall meeting. The consensus was these are top-of-mind, high priority, hot button items.
Let’s begin with the hands down number one concern. It usually began with a comment like, “Isn’t there something this state can do?” or, “Why can’t the Legislature and the governor just say no?”
Frustrated citizens cannot understand why, at a time of layoffs, shaky job security, home foreclosures, shrinking incomes, rising gas and food prices and state budget deficits that state government time and time again opts to increase taxing and spending. Citizens are making tough choices to adapt to difficult economic times and fully expect government to follow suit. Instead, state government taxes and spends even more.
The message at the town hall meetings was evident: enough is enough. I am pleased to report that I have kept my pledge and refused to vote for any tax increase. I also oppose and voted against the state budget and budget repair bill that increased spending.
Town hall attendees also made it abundantly clear they want a photo ID requirement for voting in Wisconsin. Support for the measure is overwhelming, and again, residents are dumbfounded as to why such a popular idea has been impossible to achieve.
Governor Doyle vetoed photo ID three times. During the legislative session, Democrats controlling the state Senate refused to bring a constitutional amendment requiring photo ID to the Senate floor for a vote, killing the measure. Had the amendment been put to voters in a statewide referendum, the margin of victory would likely have been substantial.
Residents attending the town hall meetings and that have contacted me are well aware of what transpired in Madison this past session and they are angry. I wish the governor and every Senate Democrat that obstructed the will of the people on photo ID would have been at the town hall meetings to hear how passionate voters are on this issue.
The “E” word also elicits great emotion: ethanol. The consensus, and I concur, is that there are far too many problems associated with ethanol, and with gas prices skyrocketing, there is growing opposition to ethanol mandates.
I was one of several legislators to sign a letter sent to Wisconsin’s Congressional Delegation, requesting they take action to ease the cost of gas for consumers. The letter asks for a repeal of the federal renewable fuel mandate, the elimination of tax credits for ethanol production, and the lifting of the reformulated gas (RFG) mandate in six southeast Wisconsin counties.
I wish to thank everyone that attended the town hall meetings. It is great to meet constituents face to face and hear what’s on their minds. I also thank community officials for allowing me the use of government facilities, libraries and a local business to host the town hall meetings.
|
By Mary Lazich
Friday, May 30 2008, 02:44 PM
This week, the state of Wisconsin celebrated a milestone.
From the Wisconsin Historical Society website:
On This Day: May 29, 1848 - Wisconsin Enters the Union On this date Wisconsin became the 30th state to enter the Union with an area of 56,154 square miles, comprising 1/56 of the United States at the time. Its nickname, the "Badger State," was not in reference to the fierce animal but miners who spent their winters in the state, living in dugouts and burrowing much like a badger. [Source: "B" Book I, Beer Bottles, Brawls, Boards, Brothels, Bibles, Battles & Brownstone by Tony Woiak, pg. 37]
|
By Mary Lazich
Wednesday, May 28 2008, 08:59 PM

Prior to the start of my Town Hall Meeting last week at the Hales Corners Public Library, I presented a special state citation to Kara Walla. Kara will represent Wisconsin this week at the National Spelling Bee in the nation’s capital.
Kara Walla is a very bright young girl. I wish her the best of luck in the competition.
Here is the wording on the plaque I presented to Kara Walla:
WHEREAS, Kara Walla, a home schooled student from Hales Corners, has won the 2008 Badger State Spelling Bee; and
WHEREAS, Kara Walla comes from a family with a long tradition of great spellers, including her father Wade, who finished ninth in the Scripps National Spelling Bee in 1982, and her aunt Theresa Walla, who came in 27th in the National Spelling Bee 1976; and
WHEREAS, Kara Walla won the 2008 Badger State Spelling Bee by correctly spelling the word “ampicillin,” before which she correctly spelled the words “disciform,” “echinoderm,” “nenuphar,” “rejoneador,” “witloof” and “zeitgeber”; and
WHEREAS, Kara Walla will now represent the state of Wisconsin at the Scripps National Spelling Bee in Washington, D.C. on May 29; now, therefore
The Members of the Wisconsin State Legislature, on behalf of Representative Mark D. Gundrum and Senator Mary Lazich, under Joint Rule 7, hereby congratulate Kara Walla for winning the 2008 Badger State Spelling Bee, and wish her the best of luck as she represents Hales Corners and the State of Wisconsin in the National Spelling Bee.
|
By Mary Lazich
Wednesday, May 28 2008, 12:47 PM
At a time when Wisconsin continues to struggle with high rates of taxing and spending, a looming structural deficit of over $1.6 billion, high gas and food prices, and per capita income below the national average, hard-working families in the private sector expect state government to exercise fiscal responsibility.
The state Senate is being asked to approve state contracts that according to data I requested from the Legislative Fiscal Bureau would be greater than the increase required for a QEO (Qualified Economic Offer).
The biennial QEO increase amount would be 7.74 percent. Proposed state employment contract increases over the 2007-09 biennium range from 8.0 percent at the low end to 11.0 percent at the high end.
Many workers across the state struggling to pay their bills and our high taxes can only dream of such increases.
This is an inappropriate time to be offering contract increases beyond the rate of the QEO and beyond the rate of inflation. I voted against the contracts.
Please see Page Two of a memo from the Legislative Fiscal Bureau for comparison of the state employment contract increases to the QEO.
|
By Mary Lazich
Tuesday, May 27 2008, 10:14 AM
|
Reminder: This week, I conclude my series of town hall meetings scheduled this spring throughout the entire state Senate District 28. I look forward to seeing you and hearing your questions, comments, and concerns.
WEDNESDAY, MAY 28
WATERFORD 5:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m. Waterford Public Library • 101 North River Street
EAST TROY 7:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m. East Troy Village Hall • 2106 Church Street
THURSDAY, MAY 29
NEW BERLIN 2:00 p.m. - 3:00 p.m. New Berlin Public Library • 15105 Library Lane
WAUKESHA 7:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m. Waukesha Town Hall • W250 S3567 Center Road
|
By Mary Lazich
Tuesday, May 27 2008, 09:36 AM
It was a warm Saturday afternoon in Texas in January 1996. Nine-year-old Amber Hagerman was riding her bicycle when a neighbor heard Amber scream. The neighbor saw a man pull Amber off her bike, throw her into the front seat of his pickup truck, and speed away.
The neighbor immediately called police and gave a description of the suspect and his truck. A search ensued, but four days later, Amber’s body was found in a drainage ditch four miles away, her throat slashed. The young girl’s assailant has never been found.
 Amber Hagerman
A citizen made a suggestion to a Dallas radio station that the news media repeat bulletins about kidnapped children the same way they treat messages about severe weather. The Amber Alert system was born and has spread across the country.
Wisconsin’s Amber Alert Plan was started by the Wisconsin Department of Justice (DOJ) in 2003. When an Amber Alert is activated, Wisconsin radio and television stations cut into programming to broadcast information about an abducted child using the Emergency Alert System. Highway message board signs also convey information about confirmed child abduction.
Seven states have instituted an Amber Alert-type system for the elderly who wander or become lost. The system that helps find Alzheimer’s or dementia patients who go missing is called the Silver Alert, and it operates in the same way as the Amber Alert program, piggybacking on current Amber Alert systems. That keeps costs down.
Stateline.org reports:
“At least 5.2 million Americans suffer from dementia, and research shows that six out of 10 of those will wander. Only 4 percent of those who leave home alone are able to find their way back without help, according to the Alzheimer’s Association.
Every year, hundreds of seniors and others with dementia wander away, on foot or driving, and if not found within 24 hours, at least half suffer serious injury or death, according to the Alzheimer’s Association. As baby boomers age, the toll is expected to multiply.”
Congress is considering giving grants to states to start their own Silver Alert programs. Another bill to be introduced in Congress this month would make Silver Alert a federally-run program in every state.
Read more about Silver Alert.
|
By Mary Lazich
Tuesday, May 27 2008, 09:04 AM
On April 1, 2008, I blogged about a Competitive Wisconsin Inc. (CWI) report that used 33 measures in six categories to show Wisconsin’s ability to compete nationally continues to sag.
The nonpartisan Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance (WISTAX) took the tables and charts from the CWI report and assigned grades to Wisconsin in all 33 benchmarks.
WISTAX reports, “Of the 33 measures, Wisconsin had four grades in the A range, 12 each in the B and C ranges, and five in the D range. The average grade over all measures was just below 2.5, or B-/C+. The two areas with the strongest grades were quality of life (averaging about a B) and workforce excellence (B- average). Low grades were given to new business creations (D+) and venture capital per worker (D), both of which suggest that future job creation could be at risk. Also disconcerting was the steady rise in energy costs (C-), once an area of decided advantage.”
Here is the entire WISTAX report.
|
By Mary Lazich
Tuesday, May 27 2008, 08:15 AM
Milwaukee has some of the most expensive health care in the country. The main reason, according to a new study by the Wisconsin Policy Research Institute (WPRI) is that there is not enough competition.
The author of the study, Linda Gorman, Ph.D. attributes the high cost to Milwaukee’s historic ties to unions. She says another factor is that health care has become consolidated, leaving less competition to keep costs lower. When competition is lacking, consumers have less alternatives. The result is more expensive health care.
How expensive is Milwaukee’s health care? The WPRI study says Milwaukee’s health care is anywhere from 27 to 55 percent higher than the national average.
State law has contributed to the increasing costs. The WPRI cites that, “Wisconsin law mandates 33 procedures be covered by a health plan operating in the state, including regulations requiring that dentists be included in plans, and mandates that require insurers to cover contraceptives, in-vitro fertilization, prescription drugs, rehabilitation, and well-child care. Each one of these adds to the cost of a consumer’s health care and makes it more difficult for a health plan to operate in Wisconsin.”
What is the solution? Gorman says there are two remedies:
1) There must be market-based tools, such as Health Savings Accounts. 2) High-deductible health plans
Gorman says prices will come down when competition has consumers shopping around. She contends that high deductible policies will allow consumers to actually save over $100,000 during their 40-year work career, and even cites companies like Whole Foods, Wendy’s International Inc, and Lutheran Social Services of Illinois that have experienced success going to HSA’s and high-deductible plans.
Here is the WPRI study.
|
By Mary Lazich
Monday, May 26 2008, 08:08 AM
|
Famed actor Johnny Depp has been in Wisconsin filming scenes for the movie, “Public Enemies.” Depp plays notorious gangster John Dillinger.
Production of the film in Wisconsin has resulted in cash into the coffers of state historical societies. Here’s the story from rivertowns.net:
John Dillinger appears to be working for Wisconsin
By Brian Bull, Wisconsin Public Radio
MILWAUKEE -- John Dillinger's legacy as a bank robber actually seems to be helping put money into the coffers of groups who are often looking for financial help -- the state's historical societies.
Director Michael Mann's film biography of the gangster, "Public Enemies," has relied heavily on authentic-looking locations across Wisconsin.
One of them is the former Second Ward office of First Wisconsin Bank in Milwaukee. The 95-year old building -- which now hosts the Milwaukee Historical Society -- was halfway through a five-year, $7.5 million renovation when Mann's scouts picked it as a location.
The Society's executive director, Bob Teske, says the generous location fee the crew paid was just the beginning.
"Just in terms for the two scagliola columns that surround our building we have had a pair of those repaired last year when we installed an elevator and just that one pair the work came to around $15,000," said Teske.
He says the filmmakers restored another six in preparation for filming on site, as well as a good deal of other repair work that brought the total to over $100,000.
Teske says that's money the Society didn't have to fork out, and the craftsmanship was top-notch.
Rick Bernstein of the Wisconsin Historical Society's Field Services Program adds that as long as people remember a movie, they can also remember the sites where it was filmed and visit them, something known as "heritage tourism."
"It's a form of tourism that really keys into this historic preservation ethic and people who are heritage tourists generally stay longer and spend more money than average tourists will," said Bernstein.
Meanwhile, the Milwaukee Historical Society's Bob Teske says they're trying to host the local premiere of "Public Enemies" next year, to help raise more money and publicity for their efforts.
The movie Public Enemies began filming in Columbus in March and is directed by Michael Mann of Miami Vice fame.
The movie stars Johnny Depp and is about the efforts of FBI agent Melvin Purvis to bring notorious criminals, including John Dillinger, to justice in the 1930s.
Film crews have been shooting at locations around Wisconsin including Oshkosh and in Manitowish Waters in Vilas County.
Filming in Manitowish Waters was at the Little Bohemia Lodge which was the actual location of a shootout between FBI agents and Dillinger on April 28, 1934.
Wisconsin recently enacted a film tax credit program to entice filmmakers to the state. Public Enemies is the first major film production to take advantage of the program which started in 2007.
|
By Mary Lazich
Monday, May 26 2008, 07:45 AM
Operation Tele-Phoney is the largest sweep of telemarketing fraud cases ever conducted by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Details of the extensive investigation were announced at a news conference at FTC headquarters in Washington D.C.
One of the cases highlighted in this national sweep was the successful prosecution of a fraudulent charitable telephone solicitation practice in Wisconsin. Donors were duped into believing their contributions would immediately go toward noteworthy charities.
Read more about the crackdown here.
The FTC has announced the “Who’s Calling?” consumer education campaign that encourages consumers to: 1) Recognize the signs of telemarketing fraud and 2) Report fraud to the FTC and state attorneys general. Here are more details.
|
By Mary Lazich
Monday, May 26 2008, 07:25 AM
The state Office of the Commissioner of Insurance has issued a consumer alert, warning senior citizens to be aware of and question sellers of insurance and annuities. There is a chance the seller is only in it for himself.
The Insurance Commissioner’s Office offers the following suggestions to avoid becoming a victim of fraud:
• Question the credentials of “experts.” Individuals often boast designations and credentials using terms such as “certified,” “accredited,” “retirement planner,” “senior advisor” or “senior consultant” to convince people they have special expertise to help seniors choose investment strategies. This may not be true. While some organizations require members to complete a difficult study program and pass extensive exams to earn designations, other organizations have much less stringent requirements that can be completed in a three- or four-day course. In the worst cases, some senior “expert” designations are earned simply by paying a monetary fee. Ask about the person’s qualifications and training, and check them out for yourself. Find out how the person earned the credential, and whether the credential actually requires learning more about older adults’ financial needs and/or more about the product being sold.
• Beware of the “Free Lunch” Seminar.
According to a report from FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority), four out of five investors 69 years and older received at least one invitation to a free lunch investment seminar in the past three years and three out of five received six or more. There is often a catch to a “free” seminar, even those advertised as unbiased and educational. Federal regulators examined 110 firms that offer free lunch seminars and found that every seminar was a sales presentation. While certain information provided at seminars may be useful, a seminar may end up being a sales presentation for life insurance, annuities, other insurance products, or investments. Such seminars often use enticements, including free meals and door prizes, or claims of “urgency” or “limited space,” in order to encourage you to attend. You should be aware that if you give contact information on a registration form, that information will be used to solicit you for future sales and marketing efforts.
• Does this product make sense for you?
Always be sure you understand what is being sold. Do not hesitate to ask questions. Financial products can be complicated even for the most informed consumer. You should be able to explain this product in your own words to someone (other than the salesperson) in a way that makes sense to both of you. The product must be right for you, your lifestyle, your financial goals, and your tolerance for risk. It’s rare that one product will meet the financial needs and goals of everyone attending a seminar. Be cautious about any promises that one product can meet all your financial needs. If the presenter doesn’t know your personal financial situation, he/she can’t know if the product is right for you.
• Never make a final decision at a seminar.
A Boston Globe article reported that “more than a third of ‘free lunch’ seminars aimed at seniors focused on unsuitable or fraudulent investments.” If you attend a seminar, you may be exposed to high pressure tactics, frightening stories about individuals who don’t have enough money to live on in retirement, and promises of amazing financial returns. Consider obtaining a second opinion from an accountant or other professional who will not benefit financially from the sale.
• Report scams.
If you feel that you may have been pressured into purchasing a product that is not right for you or if you feel that you may have been misled during a sales presentation about the product you purchased or if you simply don’t understand the product, do not hesitate to contact your state or federal regulator for assistance. Regulatory agencies are available to assist you. Financial scams happen to all kinds of consumers, including seniors. Do not let fear or uncertainty keep you from contacting the proper regulatory agencies.
Important ContactsIn all cases, before you disclose any personal or financial information, call the Office of the Commissioner of Insurance at (800) 236-8517 or the Department of Financial Institutions Division of Securities at (608) 266-1064 to verify that the person is licensed to sell insurance products or securities products, and that there have been no complaints or enforcement actions against the person. If a company hosted the seminar, contact the Better Business Bureau (or check their website at www.bbbonline.com) to learn about any complaints. To check for complaints against securities brokers, visit the Web sites of the NASAA (North American Securities Administrators Association) at www.nasaa.org, or FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) at www.finra.org.
Here is the Boston Globe article referenced above.
If you know a senior that could benefit from this information, please forward it to that senior.
|
By Mary Lazich
Sunday, May 25 2008, 08:27 AM
The Wall Street Journal has a great editorial tracking the ramifications of ethanol. It reads, in part:
“Corn ethanol can now join the scare over silicone breast implants and the pesticide Alar as among the greatest scams of the age. But before we move on to the next green miracle cure, it's worth recounting how much damage this ethanol political machine is doing.
To create just one gallon of fuel, ethanol slurps up 1,700 gallons of water, according to Cornell's David Pimentel, and 51 cents of tax credits. And it still can't compete against oil without a protective 54-cents-per-gallon tariff on imports and a federal mandate that forces it into our gas tanks. The record 30 million acres the U.S. will devote to ethanol production this year will consume almost a third of America's corn crop while yielding fuel amounting to less than 3% of petroleum consumption.”
Here is the entire editorial.
|
By Mary Lazich
Sunday, May 25 2008, 07:54 AM
The Capital Times is reporting Governor Doyle will bring back the hospital tax. The governor proposed the tax as part of the budget repair bill, but the tax was removed during budget deliberations by a conference committee.
I oppose the hospital tax.
Here is the Capital Times story.
|
By Mary Lazich
Sunday, May 25 2008, 07:16 AM
Legislation I supported to protect the existing piers of waterfront property owners has been approved by the Legislature and signed into law by the governor.
The Wisconsin Realtors Association that was part of a wide-ranging coalition that worked on the legislation reports Assembly Bill 297 will protect about 99% of current piers by grandfathering standards for those piers. Piers up to 8-feet wide and loading platforms or “decks” that are 200 square feet or less will be exempted as will decks between 200 and 300 square feet, as long as they are no wider than 10 feet.
A balance needed to be struck between the rights of waterfront property owners whose families have maintained piers for decades and the rights of the public to have access to Wisconsin’s wonderful waterways. Assembly Bill 297 provides that balance.
Owners of piers that will not be grandfathered should find the process of obtaining permits to keep their piers easier.
There are plenty of details to consider about the new law that went into effect April 14, 2008.
Conditions under previous law remain intact in the new law. A riparian owner is exempt from obtaining a permit for piers and wharves that meet all of the following requirements according to the Wisconsin Legislative Council:
- Is not more than six feet wide.
- Extends no farther than to a point where the water is three feet at its maximum depth or where there is adequate depth for mooring a boat, whichever is farther from the shoreline.
- Has no more than two boat slips for the first 50 feet of the riparian owner’s shoreline footage and no more than one additional boat slip for each additional 50 feet of shoreline.
- Is located in an area other than an area of special natural resource interest, as defined in the statutes.
- Does not interfere with the riparian rights of other riparian owners.
The new law expands the exemption mentioned above for a pier (but not a wharf) to allow a loading platform at the end of the pier that is perpendicular to the pier, is located on either or both sides of the pier, and is no more than eight feet wide.
The exemptions apply to piers and wharves that were placed on the bed of a navigable water on or before February 6, 2004.
Piers and wharves that were in place on or before February 6, 2004 that do not meet the previously mentioned requirements are referred to as “grandfathered piers and wharves.”
The new law creates an exemption from obtaining a permit for certain grandfathered piers and wharves. These piers and wharves:
- May not be more than eight feet wide.
- May have a platform at the end of the pier (not wharf) that is 200 square feet or less or, if it is from 200 to 300 square feet, is no more than 10 feet wide.
- May not interfere with the riparian rights of any other riparian owner.
To obtain this exemption, the owner of a grandfathered pier or wharf must register it with the DNR by April 1, 2011. DNR may not charge a fee for the registration.
If a grandfathered pier or wharf does not qualify for the above exemption, the owner of the pier or wharf must apply to DNR for an individual permit in order to retain the pier or wharf. The department may not charge a fee for issuing these permits.
The new law prohibits the DNR from taking enforcement action against a riparian owner who has a permit or written authorization from DNR for a structure (a pier, wharf, boat shelter, boat hoist, or boat lift) in navigable waters issued prior to February 6, 2004, if the structure complies with the permit or written authorization.
In closing, while I am pleased a solution was found to protect the overwhelming majority of pier owners, it is unfortunate this issue arose due to the DNR’s intent to regulate piers that had been in existence for decades, many owned by the same family for generations. Thank you to the realtors, the Wisconsin Wildlife Federation, the Wisconsin Builders Association, and the Wisconsin Association of Lakes for effectively working with the legislature and the DNR to grandfather existing piers.
Here is the history of Assembly Bill 297 with links to a Legislative Council memo and the enacted law.
|
By Mary Lazich
Sunday, May 25 2008, 06:44 AM
Governor Doyle signed into a law a bill I co-sponsored that creates a toll−free telephone number to receive reports from Wisconsin citizens about fraud, waste, and mismanagement of tax funds.
The toll-free hotline is operated by the Wisconsin Legislative Audit Bureau and is now up and running.
Here is a Milwaukee Journal/Sentinel article, details from the Legislative Audit Bureau on how the fraud hotline works, and the history of Senate Bill 86 that contains links to Legislative Council memos and the enacted law.
|
By Mary Lazich
Saturday, May 24 2008, 11:53 AM
Wisconsin is raising awareness about its Move Over Law.
The state Department of Transportation (DOT) is putting up information signs on the interstate.
Governor Doyle has signed a bill into law that I supported that will require instruction about the Move Over Law in driver education classes.
Here is a history of the bill that has a link to a Legislative Council memo and the enacted law.
Please check out the DOT website for audio and video public service announcements that tell why the Move Over law is so important Wisconsin.
If those public service announcements aren’t convincing enough, maybe this emotional news piece from WISN-TV Channel 12 will get the message across.
|
By Mary Lazich
Saturday, May 24 2008, 10:43 AM
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has declared that all 50 states are compliant with the Real ID driver’s license program. Maine was the last state to come on board in late March, beating the March 31, 2008 deadline. Had Maine refused to comply, the DHS would have ordered airport screeners to pat down all Maine residents before they could board airplanes.
After the Legislature approved Real ID in the 2005 legislative session that I supported, Governor Doyle signed the measure into law on March 10, 2006.
The DHS website says:
“REAL ID is a law and rule that establishes minimum standards for state-issued driver's licenses and personal identification cards. REAL ID compliant drivers licenses and ID cards will allow you to board a federally-regulated airplane, access a federal facility or a nuclear power plant.
The REAL ID Act of 2005, was passed by Congress to make it more difficult to fraudulently acquire a drivers license or ID card, as part of the effort to fight terrorism and reduce fraud.
REAL ID compliant licenses and ID cards must meet minimum standards which include
- information and security features that must be incorporated into each card
- proof of identity and U.S. citizenship or legal status of an applicant
- verification of the source documents provided by an applicant
- security standards for the offices that issue licenses and identification cards
The 9/11 Commission endorsed the REAL ID requirements, noting that “For terrorists, travel documents are as important as weapons … All but one of the 9/11 hijackers acquired some form of identification document, some by fraud. Acquisition of these forms of identification would have assisted them in boarding commercial flights, renting cars, and other necessary activities.”
Real ID was introduced in Congress by James Sensenbrenner (R-Wisconsin). Sensenbrenner’s motivation was a finding by a federal investigation that 9/11 hijackers used about 30 driver’s licenses or state-issued ID’s to pull off their murderous attacks.
Even though 50 states are officially in compliance, there is opposition in many states to Real ID. What is being called a crisis has been averted temporarily because states have been granted extensions to comply with the provisions of Real ID. That extension expires December 31, 2009. leaving it to the next President and Congress to address.
Stateline.org has more.
I concur with Stewart A. Baker, DHS Assistant Secretary for Policy who wrote the following during March 2008:
“The driver’s license is the most commonly used identity document in the United States. Originally designed to verify that you’re allowed to drive, it is now the primary identification for almost everyone over the age of 16 in the United States. It’s used to enter federal buildings, board airplanes, prove your age, and it’s even used in some states as a debit card.
Like it or not, Americans rely on driver’s licenses for every day life. That’s why the security of state licensing systems is so important. And, licensing systems are only as secure as the weakest link.
Unfortunately, we learned this the hard way. Twice.
First, in 1995, when Timothy McVeigh was able to create a fake South Dakota license with ease; all it took was a manual typewriter and a kitchen iron. He used the license to rent a Ryder truck in Oklahoma and destroy the Murrah Federal Building. Then, on September 11, 2001, eighteen of the nineteen hijackers carried government-issued IDs – mostly state driver’s licenses, many obtained fraudulently.
The 9/11 Commission recognized that it’s too easy to get false identification in the U.S. That’s why the Commission determined that ‘(s)ecure identification should begin in the United States. The federal government should set standards for the issuance of birth certificates and sources of identification, such as driver’s licenses.’ Congress responded with the REAL ID Act of 2005, which requires the federal government to set standards for the identifications it accepts.”
For our safety and security, it is abundantly clear the United States needs Real ID.
|
By Mary Lazich
Saturday, May 24 2008, 10:17 AM
With more and more citizens demanding a photo ID requirement to vote, there is another trend that is slowly developing in American elections.
The number of people who prefer not to vote in-person on Election Day and would rather mail in their vote is increasing. In fact, the state of Oregon is the first and only state in the country where all voting is done by mail. Other states are taking notice and have either implemented the system in some areas or are exploring the concept.
One of the reasons for the increase in mail voting is the relative ease of obtaining an absentee ballot. All a voter need do in many states is request an absentee ballot. No reason or explanation is necessary.
Governing Magazine goes so far as to say, “The traditional precinct election, where everyone shows up on the appointed day, is in the process of decline.”
Most states use an election system that is part in-person, part mail-in. But the eyes of election officials are on Oregon because its system is thought to be simpler, not to mention more convenient for voters who have time to study and research ballots before making choices. Once the ballot is filled out, it can be mailed or dropped off at government offices.
Supporters also claim since voters gets ballots a few weeks before election, they serve as reminders that will lead to people casting votes even in low-profile elections where they may have otherwise forgot or were unaware. Even so, requiring ballots to be mailed in has increased voter participation only slightly.
Some election officials value a mailing system, not because of convenience or simplicity, but out of necessity. The average poll worker in America is 72 years old. The number of precinct stations to vote is dropping. If voters are required to mail in ballots, the need for polling places and poll workers disappears.
If the system is so appealing, why aren’t more states jumping on the bandwagon? One reason is the ease with which absentee ballots are available. There is also concern about fraud, undue pressure applied to a voter from a family member, and the sanctity of the secret ballot lost now that it has left the polling place.
Clearly this is an election issue that will receive further study and a great amount of attention in the future all across the country.
Here is the story from Governing Magazine.
Here are details on obtaining an absentee ballot in Wisconsin.
|
By Mary Lazich
Saturday, May 24 2008, 10:02 AM
Lost in the story about a dozen nuns in Indiana being prevented from voting because they did not have photo ID is the huge turnout in the Indiana primary.
Indiana has the strictest photo ID requirement in the country, a law that was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Critics of photo ID claimed the law would disenfranchise voters and reduce voter turnout.
Hardly.
The Associated Press reports, “Voting appeared to run smoothly, despite the fears of some elections experts that the photo ID law could cause confusion at the polls. More than 1.6 million votes were cast Tuesday in the Democratic and GOP presidential races with nearly all precincts reporting, according to unofficial tallies by The Associated Press. That smashed the 1992 primary turnout of a little more than 1 million votes.”
The Indiana experience proves again that photo ID is not the problem in America’s voting system.
|
By Mary Lazich
Saturday, May 24 2008, 09:35 AM
The Wisconsin Department of Tourism has compiled a list of Wisconsin’s top events at state historic sites from May through December.
Here’s the list.
|
More Posts Next page »
The opinions and views expressed by Community Voice writers do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Journal Interactive, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel or Community Newspapers. MyCommunityNow.com does not control, is not responsible for, and does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity or quality of, the postings on this Web log. Readers can report objectionable content by clicking here.
|
|