franklinnow.com
search all things local
Rummage MapseHarmony
weather

28°

Light Snow | 15MPH

NEWSROOM * CIRCULATION * ADVERTISING

Tuesday

February 2010

9

Blog Home |  Email Author  |        Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Conservatively Speaking

State Senator Mary Lazich (R-New Berlin) represents parts of four counties: Milwaukee, Waukesha, Racine, and Walworth. Her Senate District 28 includes New Berlin, Franklin, Greendale, Hales Corners, Muskego, Waterford, Big Bend, the town of Vernon and parts of Greenfield, East Troy, and Mukwonago. Senator Lazich has been in the Legislature for more than a decade. She considers herself a tireless crusader for lower taxes, reduced spending and smaller government.

Governor Doyle's budget message should have been about taxpayer protection

By Mary Lazich
Tuesday, Feb 17 2009, 09:11 PM
It would have been nice to hear the theme of Governor Doyle’s state budget address tonight to be about his 2009-11 budget protecting Wisconsin taxpayers. The governor failed to emphasize that mission clearly, strongly, and repeatedly.

The last route the state should take is the direction the governor laid out in his 2007-09 budget address that proposed new tax and fee increases totaling $1.75 billion. The approved 2007-09 state budget that I voted against, according to the nonpartisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau 
increased taxes and fees by $763,272,000. Wisconsin’s beleaguered taxpayers in this economic downturn simply cannot afford more hits to their pocketbooks.

Every metropolitan area in Wisconsin suffered job losses during 2008. Many employers are  cutting back on their payrolls. At the national level, the U.S. Labor Department reported during January that claims for unemployment insurance are at a record high.
 At a time job security is not a guarantee, layoffs are increasing, and workers are accepting pay cuts to salvage their jobs, state government needs to refrain from taking away more of taxpayers’ hard-earned money. The government does not need the money as much as Wisconsinites need their income. Instead, it should remain in the hands of taxpayers.

Wisconsin remains one of the highest taxed states in the nation. Governor Doyle needed to acknowledge this well-documented fact and tell a statewide audience that his budget will put taxpayers first, not state coffers. For the sake of taxpayers, it would have been nice for Governor
Doyle to propose a budget that puts the brakes on runaway state spending and refrains from any new tax and fee increases. No new taxes. No new fees. No tax increases. No fee increases.

My suspicions were correct that the message the governor delivered would not be taxpayer-friendly given his overtures about a hospital tax, a tax on oil companies, an income tax increase, and yet another cigarette tax increase. The governor proposed new tax and fee increases as he did two years ago with a budget calling for increases to the tune of $1.75 billion. How will taxpayers around the state pay for budget increases with jobs and payrolls being slashed?  These dire straits are the worst possible time to place a heavier burden on workers and families by increasing taxes and fees.

It would have been nice to hear the governor reach out directly to Wisconsin homeowners paying some of the highest property taxes in the nation, and propose a statewide property tax freeze. Such an idea would have had Wisconsinites watching his speech on television leap from their seats in cheers of approval. While a property tax freeze would be welcomed in every corner of the state, we reminisce that the governor vetoed a property tax freeze in the past.

School aids are increasing under the governor’s budget. Todd Berry of the Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance believes this could result in a five to seven percent statewide average property tax increase.

One week after the state Senate approved a job-killing measure to increase the minimum wage with annual automatic increases based on the rate of inflation, the governor needed to strongly urge the Legislature to stop considering bills that will hurt  Wisconsinites, businesses,
employees, consumers.  This stern warning needed to be issued before the Legislature does even more damage.

Wisconsin’s business climate is one of the worst in the nation. It would have been nice to hear the governor say that higher taxes, fees, and government spending will only make it more difficult rather than more accommodating for businesses to create or retain jobs.

Wisconsin’s per capita income levels are some of the lowest in the country. I hoped the governor would cite this statistic and tell the state that more cannot be taken from workers earning less. Sadly, he did not.

Our state’s budget gap is the fourth highest in the country. To illustrate the seriousness our fiscal situation ranks, we are being mentioned in the same sentence as states like California and New York that are experiencing budget meltdowns. In the past, we have spent, borrowed, and pushed our troubles ahead into the next budget.  It would have been nice to hear the governor proclaim that the days of charge card budgeting ended.

The 2009-11 state budget must not be about new taxes and increased spending. The next biennial state budget must be about protecting you, the taxpayers. That is the clear, concise message that would have been nice to hear from Governor Doyle over and over again tonight. For the sake of taxpayers in need of protection, it was a disappointment.

Comments

Vox Populi   

Taxpayer protection is also about guaranteeing that the services for which we pay our taxes, like education and infrastructure, will continue to be funded. It's about guaranteeing that the state will provide equal protection under the law to all citizens. You do realize that the state government is actually responsible for providing those services, right? And to everyone, not just millionaires and big companies?

Silly question. Of course you aren't.

You don't like tax increases--especially on the stateless mega-corporations and wealthy individuals who fund your campaigns--and you don't want debt. So what massive cuts are you going to propose? How many thousands of state workers are you going to add to the unemployment lines? You are calling for clarity and concision. Start with some of your own.

February 17, 2009 10:03 PM

fvkeller   

Sen. Lazich -- If you're not part of the solution, then you're  part of the problem.

All you ever do is complain, complain, complain about Doyle and the Dems.  Blah, blah, blah.  Your constituents are perfectly capable of doing the same; I do it all the time.  But you were elected to REPRESENT and DO SOMETHING about it.

For the sake of taxpayers in need of protection, YOU are a DISAPPOINTMENT.

February 18, 2009 7:49 AM

AUH2O Republican   

Please, Senator Lazich, for once write (if you indeed actually write your blog) about your proposal for spending reductions, government streamlining, and program elimination. You've written about TAXES, TAXES, TAXES forever. Enough already, you've become a boring old school marm!!!! What about the reduction of spending!!!! Are you just afraid to stick your neck out or haven't your handlers provided you with a script yet? CLUCK!!! CLUCK!!! CLUCK!!!

February 18, 2009 8:18 AM

geno53151   

VOX, Fvkellerr, and Auh2o support the poor and low wage earner.  Where I worked, it seems most of them smoked.  It doesn't seem to bother them that the cigarette tax will be $1.75 a pack higher in the past 2 years.  (the cigarette  tax for 2 packs would purchase a TV converter box).  The "Wealthy Individuals" VOX refers to, will have no trouble paying the extra 75 cents. The Mega Corporations provide jobs.  If they leave Wisconsin maybe we can all work for the Government. OOPS I forgot , we already are by paying taxes.  Wasn't it Doyle who before he was re-elected " We should not, we must not, I will not raise taxes".  It does not seem to bother these 3 who probably voted for him.  Keep up the good work Mary.

February 18, 2009 9:07 AM

Vox Populi   

The senator is following a tired old political script. If you never say what you stand for, you can't be challenged. Even when she suggests what she supports-- the ever-popular "lower taxes," for example--she refuses to provide enough details for it to matter. The strategy is not a big surprise. She's tried lying about her votes and opinions, as with TABOR, and that didn't go as planned. The few times she's let her true opinions slip--as when she called the elderly in nursing homes "coffin bound"--it's not worked out too well, either. Better to stick to vague talking points and the party line or things she or Mr. Fischer can swipe from other blogs.

February 18, 2009 9:18 AM

AUH2O Republican   

Geno151

Where on earth did you get the idea I support the poor and low wage earner. Just because I feel that Ms. Lazich is incompetent or incapable of devising new ideas for our SERIOUS financial woes,  doesn't mean I'm a liberal.  We can't point out her shortcomings??? Your logic is flawed.  

I am a AUH2O Republican; fiscally conservative but libertarian socially. Just because I've been disgusted with the free spending, forever borrowing, religious right Republican Party doesn't mean I've joined the Democrats or the Socialists.  I can't criticize the party from within?  

I agree that taxes are too high but TAXES are only part of the problem...railing about taxes without offering any alternatives or, worse without proposing any viable options for spending reductions is intellectually dishonest.

I have repeatedly asked for Ms. Lazich to address what needs to be done on the spending side of the equation.  She is not able to do so. Either she's devoid of ideas for spending cuts or she's "chicken" to make the hard spending cut proposals.

By the way, GENO151, I voted for Mark Green.

February 18, 2009 11:36 AM

Vox Populi   

What work do you think Senator Lazich is doing, Geno? Where are her proposals?

As for the cigarette tax--yes, it will impact low wage workers. That is unfortunate. Those same people also need to step up and help pay for the estimated $480 million a year the state shells out in smoking-related health care costs. And the tax will give people further incentive to quit. A tax on alcohol might be a good idea, too, for many of the same reasons. You are in favor of people shouldering the costs directly related to their actions, are you not? Why would you not support this sort of thing?

As for the rest: yes, I think couples earning more than $300,000 can afford to chip in a little more. And mega-corporations create jobs, but they also use resources. They need to pay for that use, just like the rest of us. 60% of largest corporations in this state pay $0 in income tax. Nothing. So the costs of the resources they use--police, infrastructure, state government, education--get shifted onto individuals and small businesses. Places like Wal-Mart structure their budgets counting on the state to pay millions for the health care of their workers.

If you want your taxes to go down, you can call for government to spend less. However, you and Senator Lazich need to say specifically what you want to see cut. And you, as a taxpayer, also need to start asking why the state is giving Pepsi, Kraft, Manpower, and Kohl's tax breaks you and the small business down the block will never see. They make hundreds of millions in profit, and you are left paying their share of the taxes.

February 18, 2009 12:49 PM

fvkeller   

GENO53151,

"Keep up the good work Mary?"  Where have you been?

The "good Sen. Mary Lazich" VOTED AGAINST TABOR!  Yeah, Mary, "keep up the good work!"

Flip-flopper!

February 18, 2009 5:55 PM

Kevin Fischer   

Fred, your comment that Senator Mary Lazich voted against TABOR is false and you know it. Several months ago, after you printed an inaccurate attack on your blog about the Senator and the TABOR issue, I respectfully sent you the actual voting record on TABOR. Senator Lazich has always voted in favor of TABOR.

Your above comment could not be ignored. In your zealous and reckless effort to smear the good name and hard work of an individual, you have gone too far.  

I would advise everyone that Fred Keller is on a personal crusade to tar and feather Senator Lazich and to do so will print anything and everything, whether he has the facts to back it up or not.

I challenge Fred Keller or anyone else to produce documentation that Senator Lazich voted against TABOR. No such documentation exists. Therefore, Fred Keller's credibility on past vicious attacks against Senator Lazich and any other blogs or comments he chooses to make about Senator Lazich in the future should seriously be taken into question or rejected outright.

February 18, 2009 8:58 PM

Greg Kowalski   

Unfortunately for Senator Lazich's aide, Kevin Fischer, criticizing Fred Keller doesn't explain away Vox Populi or AUH20 Republican's positions on several of Senator Lazich's postings.

What a pity.

Count me in as another one of Lazich's constituents who'd like to see some more activity out of her. If it wasn't for this blog on every Community NOW site she represents I don't think anyone outside of New Berlin would know she even exists. Where are the legislative proposals out of her office? Why doesn't she explain more of her votes in the State Senate? Does she offer constituents the opportunity to meet her in person at various sites throughout her Senate District?

Inquiring minds want to know.

February 18, 2009 9:29 PM

Vox Populi   

Senator Lazich lied about her vote for Senate majority leader, which was a TABOR-related vote. She voted for Senator Schultz and lied about it, saying she voted for Fitzgerald. Schultz was seen as weak on or even opposed to TABOR, so her vote for him was widely decried as a betrayal of TABOR. A vote against it. It's a fair interpretation, unless you think you show your support for something by handing the leadership to the guy who is against it.

www.wrn.com/.../go.cfm

badgerherald.com/.../senator_admits_to_ly.php

www.bootsandsabers.com/.../mary_lazichs_tenuous_relationship_with_the_truth

The CRG slammed the senator again not long after this for lying about her role in bringing TABOR supporter Dr. Barry Poulson to speak in the state about the matter. They sent out a press release on March 14, 2005 that's still floating around the Internet.

February 18, 2009 10:01 PM

michelek   

If you aren't part of the solution you are part of the problem?    What????   The Senator doesn't use the blog as a forum to lay out all the legislation she is working on.   The unfortunate thing with blogs is that although it gives a forum to post information for the community you will always have constituents that won't be happy.   They expect personal phone calls from the politician detailing every decision you make and every move you are about to make.   Senator Lazich represents us true, but she isn't required to answer 3  or 4 bloggers and commentators who insist on being goofs.    The Senator has a lot of support in the communities she represents and she is very invested in seeing Wisconsin not become more of a tax hell than it already is.   Sadly, bloggers and commentators tend to believe their world is only as big as their blogging community.  Just because 3 or 4 of you find entertainment in posting comments and being "edgy" or whatever certainly isn't a representation of the community.  You certainly aren't a representation of her constituents.    

February 19, 2009 3:08 PM

Vox Populi   

The senator's constituents include many people who find her lacking. 38% of your neighbors in Waukesha County voted for Obama, Michelek. And even among Republicans, there are many who see her as a poor choice, who are embarrassed by her lies and her dopey comments about the elderly and the rest.

The recent Milwaukee Magazine write up on the senator is the best summary around right now of the general opinion of her, from the left and right:

Sen. Mary Lazich (R-New Berlin): “Everybody hates her, even the Republicans. She’s just an idiot,” says a liberal-cause lobbyist.

As for Republicans, one GOP foot soldier says Lazich, 56, is flat-out cuckoo: “Literally nuts.” Conservative activists like him despise Lazich for lying about a GOP leadership vote and for duplicitous statements on the ill-fated Taxpayers Bill of Rights legislation. “There may be no legislator taken less seriously by her colleagues,” he asserts.

“One never knows what she will do or why,” sighs another observer. “Mary’s vision doesn’t extend beyond her own short-sightedness.”

www.milwaukeemagazine.com/.../full_feature_story.asp

It's not unreasonable to expect a politician who constantly complains about taxes and the size of government to actually explain some details on how she intends to fix those things. It's not unrealistic to ask how, in her 17 years as part of that government, she has moved closer to her supposed goals. Not daily calls. Not details on every lunchtime meeting. A plan of action beyond those same vague calls for lower taxes and the reduction of the same government that has employed her for close to two decades.

February 19, 2009 6:11 PM

Cindy   

Some observations:

1) It's a miracle these comments have been allowed to see the light of day given the history of those managing the blog.

2) Whenever Kevin Fischer needs a shoulder to lean on, MicheleK is sure to be there.

3) Vox Populi - now who would we know that has a strong understanding of Latin but not want to get their feet muddied on this one?

4) Who would ever dream the Fred Keller used to walk in Kevin Fischer's footsteps. Fischer didn't just lose a following, he really made enemies.

That said, Mary (et. al.) it's the spending, stupid. Everything I've seen from your office exacerbates the problem. Can you think of even one thing that the great state of Wisconsin could do without so spending can be reduced? Then your favorite subject, taxes, would follow.

February 19, 2009 9:18 PM

AUH2O Republican   

I just saw Michellek's comment. I don't think I'm a goof nor do I believe my comments are "edgy". Even if I am a goof or my comments were edgy, what's the point and what difference would it make?  All I'm asking for is for Senator Lazich to demonstrate just a strong a commitment to reduction of spending as she does for the reduction of taxes.  Nobody's asking for her a detailed outline of whatever legislation she is working on, but some acknowledgment that spending is just as much of a problem as taxes would be nice. As I said before, it's intellectually dishonest and simpistic to rant about taxes without some acknowledgment that spending is also part of the problem. We know what her position on taxes are, what are her proposals on spending?

Ms. Lazich needs to realize that her constitutents aren't moronic robots who buy into her anti-tax jargon without any follow through on the spending issues. We breathe; therefore we think. By the way, I, in particular, don't like being talked down to.

Ms. Lazich choose to write a community blog voluntarily. I assume she did so as a way of keeping in touch with constituents. Doesn't it follow that constituents should have the ability to respond/comment  on her proposals and  columns? If some of the counter responses and comments  hurt Ms. Lazich's feelings or those of her supporters,  maybe  she should  withdraw as a blogger.  

Good Bless America!!!!!!

February 22, 2009 12:12 PM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.